Moral Ethical and Legal What Is the Difference

You will notice that in my very special diagram, the grey part does not contain the whole act. There are illegal things that someone may not consider immoral or unethical. The law is the written obligation of a company, it can only be changed in a way permitted by other laws or treaties. The law is hierarchical and generally requires respect for appointed directors. Sacred law is hierarchical, for example, the Ten Commandments are obligations written by God and should not be confused with ethics or morality. I think it`s a fascinating topic. I consider them to be interconnected but distinct concepts. Morality is the basic element of individual or collective beliefs in good/wrong in the face of situation, belief, etc. Our moral thermometer gives us an idea of where a particular moral belief falls within the threshold of acceptance: good/acceptable, morally neutral, false/unacceptable. The intensity of these feelings motivates our beliefs on a particular topic.

When a moral belief is challenged, there are effects on the individual and society (from intellectual stimulation to negative factors such as moral harm, moral distress, moral detachment) that require ethical re-evaluation and ultimate action to change or reinforce that moral value. If there is sufficient social consensus on moral belief, it will usually be codified as law and become a social value. Disclaimer: All of the following examples apply to the United States. Different countries have different standards and laws. In my opinion, morality is not outdated. Everyone needs a starting point. It usually happens to your family, culture, family beliefs, and religion. When I was born Catholic and went to Catholic school, there was always a moral compass that I had to follow. Teaching was strict at school and at home.

When I was about 12 years old, I began to question the morality of religion. There were situations, attitudes and death sentences that did not seem rational to me at school and at home. That`s when I started thinking about a fairer system. At the age of 20, I began my search for more rational values, principles and goals. I became a Buddhist at the age of 21. That`s when I became more ethical. I realized that another person couldn`t determine my values, purpose, or thoughts. Even though it was more than half of my life, I still evolve in my ethics.

The law must necessarily exist BEFORE ethics and morals. And this law should be written as a reflection of its scribe morality (its primary cause) governs personal interactions, and different social groups have different morals. Groups tend to agree (consciously or unconsciously) on a set of rules about how they behave with each other. While every human being is able to reflect and discover their own sense of what is good, right and meaningful, throughout human history, different groups have united around different values, goals and principles. Christians, consequentialists, Buddhists, Stoics, and others all give different answers to the question, „What should I do?” Each of these answers is a „moral”. Legal standards are enforced by a government agency, while ethical standards are usually enforced by human principles that include good and bad behavior. Thus, legal norms, unlike ethical norms, are punished in case of violation. In fact, when you stop complying with regulatory requirements, you`re doing yourself more harm than good to yourself, your career, and your business.

I think all three have their place – putting too much weight at the top of the pyramid would indeed result in a very oppressive environment. Laws tend to cover things that the majority of people agree on (and often change because the main opinion is fluid). If you try to enforce laws that an overwhelming majority cannot agree on, you end up with major social problems and, therefore, social movements (take any period of history and you will find great conflicts between group morality and the law). Many people find morality extremely helpful. Not everyone has the time and training to think about what kind of life they want to live, given all the different combinations of values, principles and goals. It is useful for them to have a coherent and coherent report that has been refined throughout history and can be applied in their daily lives. Positive law obliges people to do what they have to do when they do not do certain things that they have broken the law. Even in defined restrictive areas of positive law, nothing is permitted until it is made legal. Privileges are a form of positive law.

P.P. S. Here`s a little extra, assuming I didn`t confuse you enough. Sometimes moral rules trump social laws. If you take your brother`s car for a pleasure ride and call him off the road and tell him you`ll bring it back the next day, he probably will be. But he probably won`t call the police. Instead, let`s say you take the car of a random guy who lives three blocks away. Even if you call him and promise to bring him back the next day, I bet he`ll be on the phone the second he hangs up. A crazy world, right? I fully agree with your comments about differences in ethics, morality and law. From my perspective, I consider it legitimate to recognize that a different outcome may occur if moral or ethical principles were applied to the decision-making process. This recognition would serve to appease those aggrieved by the court`s decision.

You alienate your best talents and clients because those choices probably don`t fit their ethical or moral compass. I think morality is not obsolete because many people are guided by the moral code, not the law. Most of them don`t like the law and don`t agree with it. They simply see no point in it. There are many rapes and murderers who are above the law because of the high status of a villain, and ordinary mortals who want justice are victims. Therefore, morality will remain, because the law is bad. Ethical standards, on the other hand, do not necessarily have a legal basis. They are based on the human principles of good and evil. For example, if you try to park your car in a parking lot and there is only one parking space left, the only legal standard you must follow is not to exceed the speed limit or crash into another car. Now, if you see another car going to that place, ethical standards tell you not to fight for space, but to give room to the car that was there first.

It is the right thing to do. This is an ethical standard. Imagine you were the one walking around the place right now, and someone was walking by and parking there. You would feel treated unfairly, and yes, you have been wronged, ethically. For this reason, the law is narrower than ethics or morality. There are some things where the law will be agnostic, but ethics and morality have a lot to say. For example, the law will be useless to you if you try to decide whether to tell your competitor that their new customer has a reputation for not paying their bills, but our ideas about what is right and right will always guide our judgment here. The Greek and Latin origins seem to indicate that the definitions are reversed. However, I think the definitions for the use of the terms are correct. For example, Olympic athletes have a code of ethics to which they must adhere; And people are often advised to „follow their moral compass” Legal norms are standards set out in state laws. All laws to which lawyers refer are legal norms. If you drive through a big city downtown, you`ll notice parking signs everywhere telling you that you can`t park there for a long time, and they`ll quote a city law or code.

This shows a legal standard. Is morality outdated? Certainly not and never will be. One can easily observe the fluid aspects of politically correct mandates or, on the other hand, the degrees of tolerance towards libertarians. Morality is nothing more than the behavioral habits of a particular culture, it can often change without formal consensus. The law is described as a set of rules and regulations created by the government to govern society as a whole. The law is generally accepted, recognized and enforced. It was created with the aim of maintaining social order, peace and justice in society, protecting the general public and safeguarding its interests. It is created after taking into account ethical principles and moral values. Thank you to the panel of experts who sat down to explain the differences between law and ethics. God bless you all Often the term law is opposed to the term ethical, but there is a difference, because ethics is the principle that guides a person or society, created to decide what is good or bad, right or wrong in a particular situation. It regulates a person`s behavior or behavior and helps an individual live a good life by applying moral rules and guidelines. I defend the fact that morality is the law that our minds follow.

While normal, democratic law applies to corporations and organizations, morality concerns our own subjective opinions. That`s why I don`t think it`s outdated, because it shapes our personalities and thoughts. Many people use morality and ethics interchangeably. The concept of law is a completely different matter. To fully understand ethical concepts, it is important to understand the concepts of morality and law. The definition of morality will refer to ethics in a circular definition; The same goes for ethics.