There are a number of problems with these classification systems that their proponents often acknowledge. First, a classification is provided for one purpose, which may make it unsuitable for another purpose. Thus, Zweigert and Kötz intended their departments to serve as chapters in their comparative law treatise for students and lawyers. An African legal family has been omitted because it is still in the making (1996, pp. 65-6). Halakha has gradually evolved through a variety of legal and quasi-legal mechanisms, including judicial decisions, legislative decrees and customary law. The literature of questions to rabbis and their thoughtful answers are called Responsa. Over time, as practices developed, codes of Jewish law were written on the basis of Talmudic literature and responsa. The most influential codex, the Shulchan Aruch, directs the religious practice of most Orthodox Jews and some conservative Jews. Christian views on the Old Covenant vary. and must be distinguished from Christian theology, ethics and practice. The term „Old Covenant,” also known as the Mosaic Covenant and Law of Moses, refers to the statements or principles of religious law and ethics codified in the first five books or in the Pentateuch of the Old Testament. Views on the Old Covenant are expressed in the New Testament, such as Jesus` antitheses of the law, the controversy over circumcision in early Christianity and the Antioch incident, and the position of the apostle Paul and Judaism.
Most Christians believe that only certain parts are applicable, while some Protestants argue that none are applicable. The theologians of the Double Covenant are of the opinion that only Noahide laws apply to pagans. The movement of Jewish Christianity is virtually extinct. According to the New Testament, Christians are no longer considered pagans (Romans 8:28-29). The styles of application of the rules also vary from one legal institution to another in the same legal system. Variations in local political culture lead to different styles of rule enforcement in different police services (Wilson, 1968), criminal courts (Levin, 1972), and regulatory bodies (Hutter, 1988). Variations in the application of the rules also result from the personality, role concepts and political commitment of individual decision-makers; the skill and perseverance with which certain parties or their lawyers present their arguments; and the likelihood that the decision will be reported in the media or subjected to professional review and criticism. Judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals are less likely to decide cases based on their political values when they sit on boards with judges from another political party (Cross and Tiller, 1998). Regulators tend to apply the rules legalistically when publicly criticized for their perceived laxity (Bardach and Kagan, 1982), and adopt a reclusive style when potential complainants remain silent or violations enjoy the support of political authorities (Gunningham, 1987). Jurists are more likely to circumvent the rules when confronting individual subjects face-to-face, as in „Streetcorner Bureaucracies” (Lipsky 1980), than when decision-making is based on paper files or takes place in very formal contexts (Kagan 1978, p.
152). Overall, the way legal regulations are enforced is shaped by the interaction of a legal institution`s policy environment, clientele, legal culture, and how it recruits, trains and evaluates its staff. At the time of David`s revised formulation of legal families, Konrad Zweigert (1961) wrote about his theory of legal circles. He examined the styles of legal systems in order to divide them into areas of law or families. He criticized previous attempts at classification as being too one-dimensional and turned mainly to one criterion. Zweigert, as updated by Hein Kötz, found five factors that are crucial to classifying the style of a legal system or family: (a) historical context and development; (b) the predominant nature of legal thought; (c) different doctrines or legal bodies; (d) the sources of law; and (e) ideology. Using these factors, Zweigert and Kötz agreed on eight categories: Romance family, Germanic family, Nordic family, common law family, People`s Republic of China (replacing the old socialist family), Japan, Islamic law and Hindu law (Zweigert and Kötz 1996, pp. 62-73).
The specific rules create a vehicle for the analysis of disputes by social scientists. These analyses can be process-based and based on the flow of disputes; An approach models litigation as a series of stages and transitions, with litigation progressing from initial damage to initiation of litigation to formal litigation that results in a lead and eventually an appeal. Other analyses rely on tools such as game theory and economic modelling. The latter analyses provide predictions of the relative advantages and disadvantages arising from the rules and provide models of how parties and their representatives should behave in the event of economic rationality and uncertainty. Within the framework of Christianity, there are several possible definitions of religious law. One is the Mosaic Law (of what Christians consider to be the Old Testament), also called Divine Law or Biblical Law; the most famous example is that of the Ten Commandments. Another is the instruction of Jesus of Nazareth to his disciples in the gospel (often called the Law of Christ or the New Commandment or The New Covenant, unlike the Old Covenant). Another is the Apostolic Decree of Acts 15, which is still respected by the Greek Orthodox Church.  Another is canon law in the Catholic, Anglican and Orthodox Churches.
As a field of empirical academic research and legal practice, comparative constitutionalism suffers from many methodological challenges that have weighed on the fields of comparative law and political science. In addition to the more obvious linguistic difficulties and the different legal traditions that afflict the comparative law project, the historical, social, political and economic contexts of each country require special attention when examining the origins and meanings of certain constitutional forms. More recently, the growing comparative jurisprudence of constitutional and supreme courts in a number of countries has broadened the scope of comparative constitutional law and raised questions about the theory and practice of constitutionalism in the context of a globalized world. On the one hand, there is a growing attempt to formulate constitutional theories to shed light on the „increasingly cosmopolitan character of constitutional interpretation” (Choudhry 1999). On the other hand, there is an appeal to Anglo-American jurists to recognize the need for a broader legal theory of the doctrine of the state of constitutional or civil type (Dyzenhaus 1998) as an essential step towards the formulation of an adequate theory of the relationship between law and political power. It is this relationship that is at the heart of the idea of constitutionalism and is the subject of research and practice in the growing field of comparative constitutionalism. is a superficial and even erroneous view of the law as composed of the set of [legal] rules. The legal phenomenon they represent. represents a system: it has a vocabulary used to express concepts, its rules are divided into categories, it has techniques for expressing and interpreting rules, it is associated with a vision of the social order itself that determines how the law is applied and shapes the real function of law in that society (David and Brierley 1985, p. 19).
Wiccan discourse is a statement that provides the most important moral system in the neo-pagan religion of Wicca and some other related beliefs based on witchcraft. A common form of speech is „And it doesn`t hurt anyone, do what you want.” [This quote requires a quote] Muslims believe that Sharia is God`s law, but they differ in what exactly it entails.  Modernists, traditionalists, and fundamentalists all have different views on Sharia law, as do followers of different schools of Islamic thought and scholarship.